Consumer advocates turn heads in taking on cosmetics industry
The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, a bootstrap effort that grew into a national movement, has transformed the way consumers shop for personal-care items, pushed the cosmetics industry to change the way it makes products, and moved Wal-Mart to ban some harmful chemicals from beauty merchandise.
San Jose Mercury News
Chemicals of concern
Concern: A neurotoxin that can lead to learning, language and behavioral problems such as lowered IQ. Young children and pregnant women are particularly vulnerable.
Use: Color stabilizer
Where: Lipstick, hair conditioner, hair color for men, face paint for children
FDA: The Food and Drug Administration in 2012 found lead in 400 lipstick brands, with Maybelline and L’Oreal having the highest content. Of the 400 lipsticks tested, 380 tested above 0.1 ppm, the FDA’s upper limit for lead in candy. The Maybelline and L’Oreal shades had 70 times more than that.
Concern: Carcinogen linked to several cancers, including leukemia
Where: Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives have been found in shampoos, body washes and baby products. Wet n Wild brand nail polish and some nail hardeners and eyelash glue contain formaldehyde.
Phthalates, a group of chemicals; the most widely used in beauty products are dibutyl and diethyl phthalates:
Concern: Phthalates act as a hormone disrupter, affecting the reproductive system. Studies have connected phthalates to infertility, sperm-production decrease, premature birth, obesity and birth defects.
FDA: “It’s not clear what effect, if any, phthalates have on health.”
Use: To prevent nail polish from cracking, to keep hair products flexible after applied to hair, to hold the scent in perfume and as a solvent for oils
Where: Fragrances, soaps, hand and body lotion, shampoos, sunscreen, hair spray, hair gel, hair mousse, deodorant, body wash and nail polish. The Skin Deep database shows about 66 products with dibutyl phthalates.
Concern: Linked to changes in hormone levels and increased risk of cancer, especially breast and prostate cancers.
FDA: “Triclosan is not currently known to be hazardous to humans.”
Where: Antibacterial soap, body wash, shave gel, face wash, deodorant, mascara, blush, eye shadow, hand and foot cream, and about 17 types of Colgate toothpaste. Procter & Gamble, manufacturer of more than 50 beauty brands, pledged to remove triclosan from products by 2014.
Concern: Toxic to the nervous system, potentially harming the reproductive and cardiovascular systems.
FDA: According to the FDA, mercury “can damage the kidneys and the nervous system, and interfere with the development of the brain in unborn children and very young children. The FDA warns “consumers not to use skin creams, beauty and antiseptic soaps, or lotions that might contain mercury.”
Where: The FDA has restricted mercury in cosmetics, but it is still found in some brands of mascara, including the brand Love My Eyes, and skin-whitening products. It has been found in creams and soaps made in other countries and sold in the U.S.
Sources: FDA, Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, National Cancer Institute, European Commission on Public Health, The National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey, the Personal Care Products Council, California Office of the Attorney General, Skin Deep database (Environmental Working Group)
It began more than a decade ago with four women who wondered whether the hair spray, perfume and shampoo they were using every day were safe.
Their quest to find an answer led them to their neighborhood drugstores, where they spent hours reading the labels on beauty products. What they read disturbed them: lists of chemicals and ingredients whose names they couldn’t pronounce.
This bootstrap effort grew into a national movement — the San Francisco-based Campaign for Safe Cosmetics — that has transformed the way consumers shop for personal-care items, pushed the cosmetics industry to change the way it makes products, pressured lawmakers to call for more oversight, and moved Wal-Mart, the world’s largest retailer, to announce a policy last month banning some harmful chemicals from beauty merchandise.
“They really moved the needle on this,” Tracey Woodruff, director of the Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment at the University of California, San Francisco, said of the campaign. “The way that we think about cosmetics and chemicals has changed because of the work that they did.”
After setting up its headquarters in 2004 in the heart of San Francisco, the group tapped into one of the country’s most environmentally progressive areas, finding allies among the activists there and a political climate that embraced toxic-chemical regulations.
The campaign launched the first large-scale grass-roots challenge to the country’s $60 billion beauty-products industry, and in 2005 helped drive passage of California’s Safe Cosmetics Act — the only law of its kind in the U.S. — that requires cosmetic companies to disclose to public-health officials the ingredients in their products sold in California.
“The fact the (campaign) is housed in the Bay Area has everything to do with the success that we’ve had over the past decade,” said Janet Nudelman, an early leader in the safe-cosmetics movement and program director at the Breast Cancer Fund, which shares its office with the campaign.
The Personal Care Products Council, the industry trade group, declined to answer questions, saying in an email the questions “would require considerable time as they cover a multitude of complex issues.”
The council’s website says manufacturers “utilize the best science and latest available research data to substantiate the safety of a cosmetic product before it is marketed” and comply with guidelines “established by scientific and regulatory bodies around the world.”
The council says more than 11 billion personal-care products are sold each year, with about 150 reported adverse reactions — namely skin rashes or allergies — which it says makes beauty products safer than food or medicine.
Concern about a group of chemicals called phthalates touched off the campaign. Phthalates, a class of man-made chemicals, are common ingredients in personal-care products.
Even in low doses they may cause early-onset menopause, infertility in males when exposed to the chemicals as babies, birth defects and developmental disorders, according to research from several medical and scientific bodies, including the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and UC, San Francisco.
One of the campaign’s four co-founders, Jane Houlihan, a longtime leader of the Environmental Working Group, was in her office in Washington, D.C., about 12 years ago when she read a study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that found disproportionately high levels of a type of phthalate in women of childbearing years.
Women were exposed to more of it than men, Houlihan thought, through beauty products.
“I walked out of the office and straight to the drugstore and just started reading labels,” she said.
Charlotte Brody, a nurse practitioner who at the time worked for nonprofit organization Health Care Without Harm, joined Houlihan’s research efforts, which involved repeated and lengthy trips to the drugstore.
The women “became obsessed,” said Brody, formerly of Inverness, Calif., but now living in Virginia. “The kids are in the car getting cranky, and we were like, ‘Here, eat some candy; we’re going to read some more labels.’ ”
Phthalates turned up only on a handful of product labels because chemicals aren’t always disclosed. While the Food and Drug Administration has banned a few chemicals from cosmetics, it does not test or approve products before they go to market and can’t recall products, leaving safety in the hands of manufacturers. More than 12,500 chemicals are used in cosmetics, researchers say.
Brody and Houlihan were joined by Stacy Malkan, who today leads the campaign’s publicity efforts, and Bryony Schwan, who has headed a number of environmental organizations. They sent dozens of beauty-product brands to a lab for testing; results told them that three-quarters of the products contained phthalates.
“We just felt like this was such a violation of women’s trust and human rights,” said Schwan, who now leads a company in Montana that finds nature-based alternatives to toxic chemicals. “These are chemicals that you are applying directly to your body.”
The FDA has said there is no conclusive evidence that phthalates pose a human health risk, citing studies from the Centers for Disease Control, the National Toxicology Program and the Cosmetic Ingredient Review, a research panel funded by industry lobbyists.
But medical groups including the Endocrine Society, Physicians for Social Responsibility, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have warned about exposure to hormone-disrupting chemicals such as phthalates.