Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published Wednesday, June 19, 2013 at 7:43 PM

  • Share:
             
  • Comments (0)
  • Print

Report says big banks are violating mortgage settlement

The court-appointed monitor of the $25 billion settlement on Wednesday issued a report saying Citigroup, Bank of America, Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase have dragged their feet in processing homeowners’ requests for lower monthly loan payments.

The Washington Post

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
No comments have been posted to this article.
Start the conversation >

advertising

WASHINGTON — A new study confirms allegations made by state prosecutors that some of the nation’s biggest banks are violating the terms of the $25 billion national mortgage settlement, the landmark agreement to clean up shoddy foreclosure practices.

The court-appointed monitor of the settlement on Wednesday issued a report saying Citigroup, Bank of America, Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase have dragged their feet in processing homeowners’ requests for lower monthly loan payments.

These are the same charges being lobbed against the banks by Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan and New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman. The two were among the 49 state attorneys general who teamed with federal agencies to broker the settlement with the top five mortgage servicers last year.

The deal was supposed to ensure that struggling homeowners would not have to endure the same miscommunication, delays and botched paperwork that was commonplace after the housing bust. But, according to the monitor, it seems some things haven’t changed.

Four out of five banks failed at least one of 29 metrics used to measure compliance with the 304 servicing standards outlined in the settlement.

The report “affirms that the pattern of violations by Wells Fargo that my office documented in New York is harming homeowners nationwide,” said Schneiderman, who threatened to sue Wells Fargo and Bank of America in May over the violations. “These flagrant violations put homeowners in New York and across the nation at greater risk of foreclosure.”

The most common problem found among the servicers, in particular at Citigroup, Bank of America and Wells Fargo, was failure to notify homeowners of any missing documents in their modification requests within five days of receipt, according to the settlement monitor, Joseph Smith Jr. Citigroup and Bank of America were also cited for providing inaccurate information in letters they must send to borrowers before beginning a foreclosure.

“Progress is being made in a number of areas, but other harmful practice endure,” said Shaun Donovan, secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. “It is time for (the banks) to live up to their end of the deal ... if they don’t we’ll explore all options to remedy this situation from fining them to hauling them back into court.”

Servicers who fail to comply with the standards must put in place a plan approved by the monitor to correct the problem. If the problem recurs within six months, the monitor can take legal action and seek fines of up to $5 million.

The banks are in some stage of creating or implementing plans to fix the problems reported. JPMorgan has refunded premiums to 2,000 borrowers it failed to quickly reimburse when their force-placed insurance contracts were canceled.

Bank of America spokesman Dan Frahm noted that the bank “took immediate action” to resolve the problems found in the report, which did not result in “inaccurate foreclosures or improper loan modification denials.”

ResCap, formerly known as Ally Financial, passed the monitor’s tests through the end of 2012, but the company’s bankruptcy proceedings this year delayed additional testing.

The monitor’s office received nearly 60,000 consumer complaints between October and March. A majority of the grievances involved borrowers being bounced around to different bank employees, rather than being given a single point of contact.

Homeowners also complained that banks were initiating foreclosures while simultaneously negotiating a modification, a practice known as dual-tracking.

A key objective of the settlement was to improve the way servicers interact with struggling homeowners. In some respects, the banks have accomplished that goal. There were no reports of servicers losing documents or using forged paperwork to quickly foreclose on borrowers — the sorts of allegations that led to investigations and eventual agreement in the first place, said Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller.

To date, the five servicers have provided $50.6 billion worth of loan modifications, short sales, refinancing and forbearance assistance to more than half a million borrowers, according to a report released last month,

“We have some more work to do, but we’re better off today than we were a year ago,” Smith said. “The process has gotten better. Servicers are more responsive.”

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Bake cookies for a cause

Bake cookies for a cause

Get 23 scrumptious recipes in our "Quintessential Cookies" e-book. One dollar of your $3.95 purchase goes to Fund For The Needy.

Advertising

Advertising


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►