Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published June 19, 2013 at 8:19 AM | Page modified June 19, 2013 at 10:24 AM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments (0)
  • Print

United Tech sees possible impact from court order

A federal court order that United Technologies Corp. pay $473 million plus interest to compensate for alleged fraud in its sale of fighter jet engines could cut into revenue and profit, the aerospace giant said in a regulatory filing.

AP Business Writer

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
No comments have been posted to this article.
Start the conversation >

advertising

HARTFORD, Conn. —

A federal court order that United Technologies Corp. pay $473 million plus interest to compensate for alleged fraud in its sale of fighter jet engines could cut into revenue and profit, the aerospace giant said in a regulatory filing.

Judge Thomas M. Rose of the U.S. Southern District Court of Ohio issued the order on Monday. The Department of Justice had accused United Technologies subsidiary Pratt & Whitney of violating the False Claims Act, resulting in alleged overpayments for F100 jet engines from 1985 to 1990.

"The government should not have paid the amounts that the government proved it paid as a direct result of United Technologies' fraud," Rose said in his decision.

The Hartford, Conn., aerospace company said in a regulatory filing on Tuesday that with damages, penalties and interest, the penalty would rise to about $660 million.

United Technologies posted a profit of $5.13 billion last year.

"UTC strongly disagrees with the court's analysis and conclusions," the company said in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. "UTC will appeal the decision as we remain confident in our legal position."

If the government prevails, "the outcome of this matter could result in a material adverse effect" on results of operations when a liability would be recognized or cash flow for the period when damages would be paid, it said.

At issue is a dispute between United Technologies and the U.S. government over jet engine pricing. Rose cited a U.S. Supreme Court decision that said in a government-regulated market such as buying and selling between the Pentagon and defense contractors, the regulated process "represented not only the market value but in fact the only value that could be realized."

The court said Pratt and Whitney violated the False Claims Act by fraudulently asserting that prices it submitted were substantiated by the most recent data and also fraudulently saying it applied a predicted rate of inflation.

United Technologies said that what the government paid is what it should have paid, Rose said. The company proposed that historical prices, comparable sales, independent price appraisals and market prices establish fair market value, he said. But those factors come from data that are older and more out of date than what the U.S. uses to calculate damages, the judge said.

United Technologies shares fell 40 cents to $95.77 in afternoon trading.

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Meet the winemakers

Meet the winemakers

View video interviews, conducted by The Seattle Times wine writer Andy Perdue, profiling five of our state's top winemakers.

Advertising

Advertising


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►