Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published Monday, April 29, 2013 at 1:59 PM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments (7)
  • Print

Boeing shareholders rebuff CEO-chairman split

Boeing investors opted against dividing the roles of chairman and chief executive in a vote at Monday’s annual meeting in Chicago.

Bloomberg News

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
from the article: “The board is there to monitor management,”... MORE
I'm not surprised at the spin applied to a shareholder vote on splitting the jobs of CE... MORE
CEO Jim McNerney only has two years left before his retirement from Boeing maybe the... MORE

advertising

Boeing investors have opted against splitting the roles of chairman and chief executive in a vote that the Securities and Exchange Commission forced the company to allow.

About 59 percent of shareholders voted to reject the proposal at Monday’s annual meeting, said John Dern, a spokesman who cited a preliminary tally.

Both roles have been held by Jim McNerney since he joined the company in July 2005. The investor who proposed dividing them cited a three-year delay on the 787 Dreamliner and the jet’s recent grounding, among his reasons.

Requiring an independent chairman is the most popular proposal for investor meetings this year, with 53 so far, and the total may break the record of 56 in 2012, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) data show.

The move is gaining traction as boards take on a larger monitoring role, said Charles Elson, director of the University of Delaware’s corporate-governance center.

“The board is there to monitor management,” Elson said. “Why should the person who chairs the monitoring institution also be the person being monitored? It makes no sense.”

In 2012, four such proposals won a majority, and the total of almost five dozen garnered 35 percent support on average. The 11 so far in 2013, none of which were approved, had an average backing of 28 percent, ISS said.

The Boeing proposal was supported by 41 percent of shareholders, according to the preliminary tally, Dern said.

On the Standard &Poor’s 500 index, 207 companies, or 43 percent, have divided the roles of chairman and CEO. That’s an increase from 35 percent in 2007, according to a 2012 report by Spencer Stuart, a New York-based consulting firm.

The proposals are difficult to win because shareholders often back the status quo, especially when a company is doing well, Elson said.

While Boeing faced increased scrutiny after the temporary grounding of its marquee 787 Dreamliner in January, the company overtook rival Airbus in commercial-plane deliveries last year for the first time since 2002.

Boeing’s stock closed down 95 cents, or 1 percent, at $91.90 Monday. The shares have gained 22 percent this year, outperforming a 12 percent increase for the S&P 500 index.

“The more a company has a performance issue, the more likely these things will get support,” Elson said. “Theoretically, they should get a lot of support. They make sense.”

Ray Chevedden, the shareholder who submitted the proposal, said it would strengthen oversight. He reiterated his concerns in a letter to the SEC the day that the 787 grounding began.

Boeing has since won regulatory approval for the planes to return to flight, and airlines have begun to do so.

Boeing said its board has a lead director, Ken Duberstein, with “extensive and clearly delineated responsibilities” to provide independent leadership.

Those include presiding at executive sessions of independent directors in which McNerney is not present.

The company gave Duberstein additional powers in mid-April in a move to head off the shareholder vote.

Before McNerney was hired, Boeing’s chairman was an independent director, and the company may choose to return to that structure in the future, Boeing said in a proxy filing.

“Implementing this proposal would impose a one-size-fits-all solution on Boeing that ignores the board’s judgment and responsibilities in this area for no discernible benefit,” Boeing said.

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

The Seattle Times Historical Archives

Browse our newspaper page archives from 1900-1984


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►