Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published Thursday, March 28, 2013 at 1:36 PM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments (0)
  • Print

Findings on 2012 mutual fund performance vs market

Managers of stock mutual funds had a tough time beating the market in 2012, with two-thirds failing to achieve that goal. That's according to S&P Dow Jones Indices, which this week released its 11th annual managed fund vs. stock index performance scorecard.

The Associated Press

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
No comments have been posted to this article.
Start the conversation >

advertising

Managers of stock mutual funds had a tough time beating the market in 2012, with two-thirds failing to achieve that goal. That's according to S&P Dow Jones Indices, which this week released its 11th annual managed fund vs. stock index performance scorecard.

U.S. stock funds that are actively managed, rather than track an index, posted an average return of nearly 14.7 percent last year. The return for the broader market was about 16.2 percent, as measured by the Standard & Poor's Composite 1500, an index that includes large-, mid- and small-cap stocks.

Over 10 years, the average percentage of funds underperforming in a given year was 57. Below are the percentages of funds that failed to beat the S&P 1500 in each of those years:

2002 - 59%

2003 - 48%

2004 - 51%

2005 - 44%

2006 - 68%

2007 - 49%

2008 - 64%

2009 - 42%

2010 - 58%

2011 - 84%

2012 - 66%

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

The Seattle Times Historical Archives

Browse our newspaper page archives from 1900-1984


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►