Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published Monday, February 4, 2013 at 9:03 PM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments (0)
  • Print

Consumer Reports questions turbocharged engines

Consumer Reports is warning car buyers that turbocharged engines may not deliver the speed or fuel economy they expect.

The Associated Press

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
No comments have been posted to this article.
Start the conversation >

advertising

DETROIT —

Consumer Reports is warning car buyers that turbocharged engines may not deliver the speed or fuel economy they expect.

The magazine said Tuesday that its tests showed turbocharged models from Ford, Hyundai and Kia are less efficient than competitors. It also said the turbocharged Chevrolet Cruze got little extra power or fuel economy.

The magazine praised a turbocharged four-cylinder from BMW.

Turbochargers pump extra air into engines to boost power. Carmakers charge more for them, promising extra power.

Consumer Reports said a new Ford Fusion with an optional 1.6-liter EcoBoost engine was slower and got lower fuel economy than a Toyota Camry, Honda Accord or Nissan Altima with regular engines.

Ford said it can't speak for Consumer Reports' tests, but its surveys show EcoBoost customers are satisfied with their fuel economy.

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Career Center Blog

Career Center Blog

5 tips for fighting job burnout


Advertising